Meat
for Christians                          Jesus is Lord!
An eBook by Patrick Harrity

Astounding Facts on Modern Christian Issues


                                           
Spiritual Food for Starved Christians                                                                                                     Jesus is Lord!
Excerpts

Modern slavery

Homosexuality

Abortion

Euthanasia

ACLU

European Union, the North American Union, and World Government

Global Warming Scam

The Lie of Evolution

Proof of God’s Existence


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!

Modern Slavery                    

 

·         There are more slaves in the world today than in any other time in history, some 27 million, bought for an average cost of only $90[1]. 

·         The number of slaves would be equivalent to the combined populations of Austria, Hong Kong, Finland, Ireland and Botswana; or 600 Angel Stadiums crammed to capacity; or a line of people stretching from New York to California, and back.  Each, each, is a human being of great value in the eyes of God and is living a life of wretched suffering. 

·         Most are in India and Africa, but many languish in the gleaming cities of modern nations, including the United States, into which an estimated “14,500 to 17,500 people are trafficked…each year to be used as slaves.”[2]

·         Children sold into slavery will be used for child soldiers, forced labor, domestic servitude, forced marriage/bride selling, camel racing, street begging and organ harvesting; “but the vast majority will be used for sex,” including prostitution, sex tourism and pornography.[3]

·         Human trafficking is the third largest criminal business and the fastest growing.[4] 

·         The UN “estimates that at least 1.2 million children were transported for the purposes of exploitation in 2005. …  Following narcotics and weapons, the trafficking of human beings brings in annual worldwide profits ranging from 7 to 13 billion dollars.”[5]  The actual number is probably much higher.  UNICEF estimates the annual income from the sex trafficking of children alone to be 12 billion dollars.[6]  These figures yield an average annual income of $10,000 per child slave.  $10,000 per year for an initial investment of only $90.  This is the most profitable crime on earth.  And arguably the most evil.  For what could be more evil than the slow torturing to death of the body, mind and soul of an innocent child?

·         Unlike other merchandise, like drugs, which are sold once and used up, “one child can be sold multiple times…some children are forced to service customers 20 to 30 times a day” and 4,000 times a year.[7]  They suffer additionally from fear, anxiety, beatings, whippings, depression, shame, guilt, insomnia, hunger, drug addiction, untreated illnesses, damage to reproductive organs, painful chafing, “sexually transmitted diseases, HIV/AIDS, pelvic pain, rectal trauma and urinary difficulties.”[8]

·         “Trafficked children suffer irreparable damage to their physical and mental health.  The severe risks to which they are exposed often lead to early pregnancy, forced drug addiction, AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, and ultimately death.”[9]  And of course, forced abortions and severe physical beatings. 

·         In the past, when slavery was legal, slaves were very expensive.  Now they are so cheap and abundant as to be nearly disposable.  At $90, their cost is less than that of a dog.

·         Children are being used to produce increasingly horrifying pornographic images, one example of which was a baby girl being raped and sodomized.[10]  This would likely kill a baby.  But depraved people pay vastly more for the pornography than what the child cost, so a profit is made.

·         Victims are typically lured under false pretenses such as lucrative job offers or an educational opportunity.  They are then smuggled to their owners and enslaved.  Corrupt government officials are bribed along the way; these officials also frustrate hopes of escape, or return escapees to their captors.  Victims are also kidnapped from the streets, or sold by impoverished parents, or betrayed by migrant smugglers who turn on them, and enslave them and any children they brought with them.  Their captors use fear, threats to them and their families, debt, rape, extreme violence and drug addiction to keep them under control.

·         Women and girls as young as six are trafficked for sex.[11]

·         “UNICEF and Free the Slaves have determined that more than 30 million children have been traded over the last three decades throughout Asian countries” alone.[12]

·         “The International Labor Organization reported that ten to fifteen percent of the gross domestic product of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand derives from sex tourism,”[13] where mostly men, usually pedophiles, travel to have sex with underage girls and boys.  “In Cambodia, a virtual haven for child sex tourists, it is estimated that one-third of the prostitutes are children…around thirty thousand.”[14]  “In the Philippines, ‘300,000 Japanese take sex tours every year.”[15]  “In Thailand, UNICEF estimates the number of Thai children involved in prostitution is between 60,000 and 200,000.”[16]

·         Children are kidnapped and used as child soldiers and for sex for adult soldiers.  They are forced to commit abominable atrocities, sometimes even against their own family and friends.  In 2006, the worldwide number of child soldiers was estimated at 250,000 to 300,000, one third girls, in over 30 countries.[17]


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                               Back to top


[3] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pp. vii, 2.

[4] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 2, quoting U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services.

[5] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 3.

[6] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 11.

[7] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pp. 3, 11.

[8] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 147, quoting U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services.

[9] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 4.

[10] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 53, quoting Alice Fisher’s U.S. Senate testimony.

[11] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 25, quoting former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

[12] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 124.

[13] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 64.

[14] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 65, quoting an ECPAT study and Cambodia’s Minister of Women’s Affairs, Mu Soc Hua.

[15] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 125, quoting Dr. Mohamed Mattar, Executive Director of The Protection Project.

[16] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 125.

[17] Raymond Bechard, Unspeakable (New York:  Compel Publishing, 2006), pg. 75, quoting United Nations research.


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                                 Back to top

Homosexuality

 

Did you know?[1]

  • About half of male homosexuals die before age 42, and about half of lesbians die before age 45.[2]
  • The average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year.[3]
  • 43% of homosexuals have had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1000 or more; and 79% say half of their partners are total strangers.[4]
  • The average number of partners for homosexual men is about 1,100.[5]
  • 78% of homosexuals are affected by sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).[6]
  • 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae.[7]
  • 50-75% of homosexuals are or were once infected with hepatitis B virus.[8]
  • 25-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics.[9]
  • 25-33% of homosexual couples living together have a serious problem with domestic violence.[10]
  • Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (mostly by each other), 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident.[11]
  • 21% of lesbians die of murder, suicide or traffic accident.[12]
  • About 50% of the women on death row are lesbians.[13]
  • 33% of homosexuals admit to minor/adult sex.[14]
  • 50% of suicides are homosexuals.[15]

 

Homosexuals make up only about 1-2% of the population, yet,[16]

·         They commit more than 33% of reported child molestations in the U.S.[17]

·         They account for 60% of syphilis cases in the U.S.[18]

·         They account for 17% of non-sexually transmitted disease (STD) hospital admissions.[19]

·         They account for 70-80% of hepatitis cases in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne.[20]

·         They account for about 80% of the most serious STDs in the U.S.[21]

·         White male homosexuals account for 77% of transmission of HIV/AIDS among whites; black male homosexuals account for 49% of transmission of HIV/AIDS among blacks.[22]

·         They account for well over 50% of U.S. AIDS cases, which cost about $300,000 each for treatment, not to mention the vast numbers of non-AIDS maladies, which raise insurance rates, or taxes in the case of socialized medicine, for the rest of us 98%.[23]  That is an enormous sum, considering that the care of AIDS and HIV patients alone consumes about 1% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the U.S (about $100 billion per year).[24]

o       This statistic reveals the motivation behind the homosexual agenda for same-sex marriage and socialized medicine–to get society to pay for the grossly disproportionate health care demands of their sinful lifestyle.


  • A gay parade of 100. Statistically, 50 die before 42; 80 have infectious pathogens; 80 have a history of STDs; 30 have HIV; 10 have AIDS; 30 have digestive or urinary ailments; 30 alcoholics; 50 drug users; 40 depressed; 20 tried suicide; 60 regularly have sex with strangers; 10 prefer boys to men; 10 sadomasochists; the group averages 200 partners/month (2 per person per month). It is a deathstyle.[25] 

 

Are you a homosexual?  Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.  He loves you.

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

How?  Believe that Jesus Christ came to the earth as God in human form, that he died on the cross to pay the price for your sins; that He rose again three days later and is alive today; and that all who believe on Him and receive Him as Lord of their lives will be saved. 

 

Pray:  Dear Lord Jesus, I know that I am a sinner and need Your forgiveness. I believe that You died for my sins. I want to turn from my sins. I now invite You to come into my heart and life as my Lord and Savior.  In Jesus' name. Amen.


Back to top

BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!


[1] Mostly from:  Joseph M.D., Frank.  “Everyone Should Know these Statistics on Homosexuals.” http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02rStatistcs.html.

[2] Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

[3] Corey, L. and Holmes, K. "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men." New England J. Med., 1980, pp. 435-38.

[4] Bell, A. and Weinberg, M. Homosexualities: a Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978.

[5] Sheldon, Louis P.  “The Agenda.”  Florida:  FrontLine, 2005, p. 6.

[6] Rueda, E. The Homosexual Network. Old Greenwich, Conn., The Devin Adair Company, 1982, p. 53.

[7] Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

[8] Dr. Neil Reiner, 96 Annals of Internal Medicine, 1984:170.  Cited in Alan Sears and Craig Osten’s, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 43.

[9] Kus, R. "Alcoholics Anonymous and Gay America." Medical Journal of Homosexuality, 1987, p. 254.

[10] Barnes, P.  “It’s Just a Quarrel.”  ABA Journal 84, February 1998.  [Sheldon p. 93.]

[11] Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

[12] Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

[13] Lesbian News, January 1994.

[14] Family Research Institute, Lincoln, NE.

[15] Kaifetz, J. "Homosexual Rights Are Concern for Some," Post-Tribune, 18 December 1992.

[16] Mostly from:  Joseph M.D., Frank.  “Everyone Should Know these Statistics on Homosexuals.” http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02rStatistcs.html.

[17] Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, pp. 327-37.

[18] "Changes in Sexual Behavior and Incidence of Gonorrhea." Lancet, April 25, 1987.

[19] "Changes in Sexual Behavior and Incidence of Gonorrhea." Lancet, April 25, 1987.

[20] Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

[21] Bell, A. and Weinberg, M. Homosexualities: a Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978. [Sheldon, p. 63.]

[22] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, December 3, 2004. [Sheldon, The Agenda,  p. 67.]

[23] Kaifetz, J. "Homosexual Rights Are Concern for Some," Post-Tribune, 18 December 1992.

[24] Oldham, Jennifer.  “The Economic Cost of AIDS.”  Los Angeles Times, October 13, 1995.  [Sheldon, p. 63-64.]

[25] Adapted from:  Thomas Schmidt, “Straight and Narrow?  Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate,” Intervarsity Press, p. 127.  Cited in “The Gay Agenda: A Christian Response,” David Morrison, Human Life International, p. 8.

 


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                                      Back to top

Abortion

Facts on abortion worldwide

 

·         There are about 42 million abortions per year, or about 1.3 every second.[1]

·         About one in five pregnancies ends in abortion.[2]

·         There is about 1 abortion per woman, on average.[3]

·         About five million women are hospitalized each year for abortion complications such as hemorrhage and infection.[4]

·         Over one in a thousand mothers having abortions will die from it.

·         About 67,000 women die per year from abortion complications.  That’s about 8 per hour, or 13% of all maternal deaths.[5]

·         The mothers of about 220,000 children die per year from abortion.[6]  That’s about one child becoming motherless from abortion every 2.5 minutes.

·         Over one third of pregnancies are unplanned.

·         99.3% of abortions are because the mother feels it would affect her lifestyle.[7]

 

 

 

Prov 6:16-18, These six things the LORD hates, yes, seven are an abomination to Him:  A proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift in running to evil,(NKJ)

 

 

Facts on abortion in the U.S.

 

·         There are about 1.21 million abortions per year, or about one every 26 seconds.[8]

·         45 million abortions occurred 1973- 2005.[9]

·         15-25% of women having abortions will later develop breast cancer.[10]

·         Oral contraceptives such as the pill cause on average one or two “silent” abortions per year for each user,[11] and between 1.5 and 4.2 million total per year in the U.S.[12]

·         Almost half of all pregnancies are unplanned.[13]

·         40% of unplanned pregnancy end in abortion.[14]

·         22% of pregnancies excluding miscarriages end in abortion.[15]

·         Half of American women will have an unplanned pregnancy by age 45.[16]

 

 

·         17% of abortions are by teenagers; 33% by women ages 20-24.[17]

·         The average number of abortions per year in states other than California are about 25 thousand; the average number of abortions per year in California are about 280 thousand.[18]

·         One third of unplanned pregnancies are with women who have already had an abortion.[19]

·         Two-thirds of abortions are by women who have never married.[20]

·         Although blacks are only 13% of the population, they have 37% of all abortions.[21] 

·         Blacks are three times as likely as white women to have an abortion; Hispanics twice as likely.[22]

·         13% of abortions were by women who reported they were taking the pill but it failed.[23]

·         14% of abortions were by women who reported their partner used a condom correctly but it failed.[24]

·         58% of abortions were by women using some form of contraception that failed.[25]

·         13% of all abortions are paid with public funds.[26]  That means taxpayers are paying for one abortion about every 3 minutes.


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                                       Back to top


[1] Data from 2005.  Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Åhman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007; 370: 1338–45.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[2] Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Åhman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007; 370: 1338–45.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[3] Center for Bioethical Reform (abortionno.org), cited in http://www.abortiontv.com/.

[4] Singh S, Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries, Lancet, 2006, 368(955):1887–1892.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[5] World Health Organization (WHO). Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2003, Geneva: WHO, 2007. In Press.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[6] Grimes DA et al., Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic, Lancet, 2006, 368(9550):1908–1919.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[7] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 186.

[8] Data from 2005.  Jones RK et al., Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):6–16.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[9] Jones RK et al., Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):6–16.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[10] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 25.  (Rate is about 10% in general population.)

[11] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, pp. 74-75.

[12] S. Killick, E. Eyong, and M. Elstein. "Ovarian Follicular Development in Oral Contraceptive Cycles." Fertility and Sterility, September 1987, pages 409 to 413.  Cited in Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” p. 75.

[13] Finer LB and Henshaw SK, Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(2):90–96.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[14] Finer LB and Henshaw SK, Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(2):90–96.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[15] Jones RK et al., Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):6–16.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[16] Jones RK et al., Repeat abortion in the United States, Occasional Report, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006, No. 29. (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[17] Distributions published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adjusted for year-to-year changes in the reporting states and applied to the total number of abortions in Jones RK et al., Abortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):6-16.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[18] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cited in abortiontv.com.

[19] Jones RK et al., Repeat abortion in the United States, Occasional Report, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006, No. 29; Henshaw SK, Unintended pregnancy in the United States, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(1):24–29 & 46. (Both cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[20] Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(5):226–235. (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, guttmacher.org.)

[21] Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.

[22] The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform; http://www.abortionno.org/.

[23] Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000–2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(6):294–303.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[24] Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000–2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(6):294–303.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

[25] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 28.

[26] Henshaw SK and Finer LB, The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2003, 35(1):16–24.  (Cited in Guttmacher Institute, www.guttmacher.org.)

 

BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!
Euthanasia                                                         Back to top

 

·         Colombia, the Netherlands (Holland) and Belgium have legalized euthanasia; Colombia and the Netherlands have also legalized physician-assisted suicide.[1]

·         Hospital administrators in the Netherlands instruct doctors to give involuntary lethal injections to elderly patients if care is too expensive.[2]

·         68% of the elderly in the Netherlands fear being killed without their consent.  Nursing homes have shrunk by 80% and many of the residents of those remaining will not drink anything but tap water for fear of being poisoned (doctors are given books on how to put tasteless poisons in food and drink).[3]  But it’s not only the elderly being euthanized in the Netherlands; infants and teenagers are being killed also.  And presumably tourists who have the misfortune to fall ill in that land of death.

·         Many Dutch citizens, fearing for their lives should they end up in the hospital, carry “Do not kill me” cards, but these are often ignored by doctors eager to kill.

·         About 9% of all deaths in the Netherlands in 1990 were by physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia.[4]  This is about ten thousand or so.

o       Of these, about 69% of the patients were euthanized without their consent; 26% were euthanized with consent; and 5% were physician assisted suicides.  Thus, over 6% of all deaths were by euthanasia without consent.[5]

·         31% of pediatricians in the Netherlands have killed infants; of these infants killed, a fifth were killed without parental consent.[6]

·         33% of deaths in the Netherlands in 1995 (44,774 total) were caused by lethal injection, increased pain treatment, or non treatment, each without the patient’s consent.

·         At least 200,000 were euthanized in Nazi Germany.  Today, about ten thousand are euthanized annually in the Netherlands alone.

·         A study finds general practitioners in Great Britain killed about 27,000 patients by giving them a lethal dose of drugs or by withholding treatment.  The survey noted that one in seven killed an average of five; that’s an average of almost one killing per doctor.[7]

·         The state of Oregon in the U.S. has legalized physician-assisted suicide.

·         The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that there is no federal constitutional right to assisted suicide.[8]

·         The Hippocratic Oath, taken by doctors the world over, states in part, “I will…never do harm to anyone…I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan.”

·         Even though states may not have formally legalized active euthanasia, it is still practiced passively by the withholding of medical treatment or food and water to those who have indicated a desire for such (voluntary) and to those who are incapacitated and have not (involuntary).


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!

         Back to top

[1] "History of Euthanasia," http://www.euthanasia.com/.

[2] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 135.

[3] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 135, 137.

[4] J. Remmelink et al., "Medical Decisions About the End of Life": Report of the Committee to Study the Medical Practice Concerning Euthanasia, SDU Publishing House, The Hague, 1991; Van der Maas, P.J., van Delden, J.J.M., Pijnenborg, L., "Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life." Elsevier, Amsterdam-London-New York-Tokyo 1992, 73 tabl. 7.2, 75 tabl. 7.7, 138 tabl. 13.8, 178-9, 182-3.  Cited in Nightingale Alliance, Fast Facts, http://www.nightingalealliance.org/.

[5] Derived from data from:  J. Remmelink et al., "Medical Decisions About the End of Life": Report of the Committee to Study the Medical Practice Concerning Euthanasia, SDU Publishing House, The Hague, 1991; cited in “Euthanasia Results in the Netherlands – 1990,” euthanasia.com.

[6] Wesley J. Smith, “Now They Want to Euthanize Children,” the Center for Bioethics and Culture, thecbc.org.

[7] Cahal Milmo. "Doctors 'Helped 27,000 Patients to Die'." PA News, Sunday, November 15, 1998.  Cited in Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Euthanasia, CD.

[8] Cited in http://www.religionfacts.com/euthanasia/stats.htm.

 

BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!
ACLU                                                                     Back to top


The ACLU has sued to:
[1]

 

  • Halt the singing of Christmas Carols in public facilities.
  • Allow children to view pornography in public libraries on the internet.
  • Deny tax-exempt status for Churches.
  • Remove all military chaplains.
  • Remove all Christian symbols from public property.
  • Prohibit Bible reading in classrooms even during free time.
  • Remove In God We Trust from our coins.
  • Remove God from the Pledge of Allegiance.
  • Deny federal funding for Boy Scouts until they admit gays and atheists.
  • Prevent schools from refusing to put pro-homosexual literature in their libraries.
  • Prevent people from putting traditional marriage definition initiatives on the ballot, and reverse elections in which people voted to define marriage traditionally.[2]
  • Force a conservative Jewish school to allow two lesbians to live in married student housing.[3]
  • Stop lunchtime prayers by the Virginia Military Institute and the U.S. Naval Academy.[4]
  • Remove the Mojave WWI and Mount Soledad war memorial crosses.
  • Prevent the burial of aborted babies.[5]

 

The ACLU has also sued to remove the cross from the Los Angeles county seal, but it had no problem with Pomona, the Roman goddess of the harvest, being on the seal.  Removal of the cross cost taxpayers $1 million.

 

The ACLU has defended publically-displayed art degrading Christianity, including:[6]

 

  • A crucifix submerged in a jar of urine.
  • A painting of the Virgin Mary with elephant dung smeared on it.
  • A painting of a naked, crucified woman on display in the Honolulu City Hall.

 

The ACLU has also:

 

  • Successfully fought to strike down an Iowa law which would have prevented sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of day-care centers and schools.[7]
  • Defended the website of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), which provides guidance on how to seduce and sexually molest boys without getting caught.[8]  These website materials incited two men to kidnap, torture, rape and murder a young boy.  Free speech that is ”directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action” is not protected.  However, despite the fact that the materials incited two men to kidnap, torture, rape and murder a young boy, the ACLU did not agree that the website met this standard and argued it should be protected.
  • Encouraged anarchy, when, in 2004, it called upon states to defy laws against same-sex marriage and issue same-sex marriage licenses anyway.[9]
  • Promoted a National Day of Appreciation for Abortion Providers, in which abortionists, with the blood of innocents dripping from their hands, were to be thanked as heroes.
  • Argued that a Muslim woman could be photographed for her driver’s license wearing a veil.
  • Successfully fought to force Catholic Charities to provide contraceptives to its employees, even though Catholics view contraceptive use as sin and this would violate their conscience.
  • Called prayer before a high school basketball game “un-American and immoral” and demanded jail time for the same school officials who allowed prayer at an awards banquet.[10]

 

 

The ACLU is fighting to:[11]

 

  • Legalize child pornography (including pictures by criminals of actual molestation, sexual abuse, rape, torture and murder of children).
  • Legalize polygamy and same-sex marriage.
  • Legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.
  • Allow pornographic stores to locate anywhere, including next to churches or day-care centers.
  • Prevent the military from disallowing open displays of homosexuality between soldiers.
  • Prevent parents from opting their children out of objectionable public school teachings, such as teaching that homosexuality is normal and acceptable.
  • Prevent public schools from recognizing traditional holidays such as Christmas, Easter or Hanukkah.
  • Abolish legislative, military and prison chaplaincy programs.
BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                                                                                   Back to top


[1] Mostly from:  Jack Kinsella (Omega Letter Editor). America's Communist Lawyers' Union, 12/2/04,  http://www.omegaletter.com/articles/articles.asp?ArticleID=4195, as excerpted from the Omega Letter Daily Intelligence Digest, Volume 38: Issue: 26.

[2] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 37.

[3] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 126.

[4] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 127.

[5] Brian Clowes, “The Facts of Life,” Human Life International, Front Royal, 2001, p. 15.

[6] Liberty Counsel fact sheet, “Some Amazing Facts about America’s Enemy Within.”

[7] David Pitt, “Judge Strikes Down Iowa Sex-Offender Law,”  AP, 2/9/04.  Cited in Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 78.

[8] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  pp. 74-76.

[9] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 35.

[10] “High School’s Pre-Game Prayer Called ‘Un-American and Immoral,’” WKYC.com, April 6, 2005; cited in Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 145.

[11] Alan Sears and Craig Osten, “The ACLU vs America,” Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, 2005.  p. 3, 96, 119. 120.



BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!

The European Union, the North American Union, and World Government


Formation of the European Union                                                                           Back to top

 

Jean Monnet was the architect of the European Union (EU).  He knew that citizens of the countries of Europe would never have allowed their national sovereignties to be surrendered.  So he had to proceed slowly, quietly, disguising his moves and intentions, like a chess grandmaster.

 

His ingenious plan was to first unite the nations economically for reasons of security and prosperity.  Countries united economically would be more prosperous and less likely to war, he argued.  Once economically united, he knew political union would naturally follow.  In fact, before the Europeans knew what hit them, most of the infrastructure for a political union was already in place within the economic machinery.  It was then only a small side-step to political union.  Few Europeans wanted this.  Few believed it could ever happen.  And yet it happened.  Their national sovereignties were ceded to the EU. 

 

The following are the steps Monnet and other globalists used over about a half century to surreptitiously forge the EU.[1]

 

  • 1950.  Shuman Declaration.  French and German coal and steel production pooled.
  • 1951.  Treaty of Paris.  Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands (“the six”) form the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC).
  • 1957.  Treaty of Rome.  “The six” form the European Economic Community (EEC), also called the European Common Market.  The European Atomic Energy Commission (EAEC) also established.
  • 1957.  European Court of Justice (ECJ) established to arbitrate trade disputes.
  • 1960.  European Free Trade Association (EFTA) formed between Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK.
  • 1965.  The EEC absorbs the ECSC and the EAEC.
  • 1968.  European Customs Union established to remove internal border duties and establish common tariffs on imports.
  • 1978.  European currency unit (ECU) and exchange rate mechanism (ERM) established.
  • 1986.  Single European Act unifies European market.
  • 1992.   Treaty of the European Union forms the European Union.  Also called the Maastricht Treaty because it was signed in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • 2002.  Euro currency established.

 Could this really happen to the United States? 

 

These same steps are now being implemented in the United States, Canada and Mexico to form a North American Union and possibly a new North American currency, the Amero.  The conspirators deny the end game is to create a North American Union (NAU) and a new currency, but there can be little doubt they are maneuvering their chess pieces for our king, that is, our sovereignty, our constitution.

 

It is interesting to note that some think the pace of events is so rapid now that the regionalization step may be bypassed and go straight to world government.  But unless there is a tremendous crisis of vast proportions it is more likely to occur by regionalizing steps.  Other regional unions are also forming, for example the African Union.

 

Few Americans want to give up American sovereignty, few want a North American Union, and few believe it could ever happen, but its formation is already underway by globalist elites who don’t care what the people want.  As with the EU, their chess strategy begins with promises of enhanced security and economic prosperity.  Here’s what’s been done so far:

 

·         1988.  Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the United States and Canada.

·         1994.  North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) adds Mexico.

·         5-6 September 2001.  Partnership and Prosperity Initiative, between Mexico (Fox) and the United States (Bush), which had as its apparent goal a study of ways the United States could invest in Mexico’s economy which would make Mexico more attractive to workers and consequently reduce illegal Mexican emigration.[2]

·         11 September 2001.  Crisis.  Attacks on World Trade Center towers and Pentagon.

·         17 October 2001.  Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a notoriously globalist organization of elites funded over the years by the Rockefellers, reveals its involvement when it convenes a meeting entitled, “The Future of  North American Integration in the Wake of Terrorist attacks.”  This introduced the element of security and also “stressed the importance of transportation infrastructure in advancing the integration of North America.”[3]

·         2004.  CFR creates “an independent task force on the future of North America.”[4]  Included in the group is Robert Pastor, one of the main planners for a North American Union and a new currency, the Amero.  Pastor is to the emerging NAU what Jean Monnet was to the emerging EU.

·         March, 2005.  CFR issues the report, “Creating a North American Community,” (NAC) in which is proposed the creation of a NAC by 2010.[5]  The report called for a security perimeter around the three countries collectively but dissolution of the borders between them.  This adds insight to why efforts to increase border security between the U.S. and Canada and Mexico are stalled and half-hearted; if they plan to open the borders later, why fortify them now?  The report also called for “a North American Investment Fund to stimulate infrastructure development in Mexico.”[6]  This is basically a wealth transfer from the U.S. to Mexico, draining the middle class of its wealth and position.

·         23 March 2005.  Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is formed between United States, Canada and Mexico.  This set in motion working groups in all three countries crafting policy towards a North American integration, and it is going forward at full steam.  Nobody voted for this, including Congress.  It never came up for a vote.  Why?  Because it wasn’t crafted as law or treaty or even written agreement, which would have required congressional approval, but as Dialogues, or Frameworks of Common Principles, or  Memoranda of Understanding, or Declarations of Intent.[7]  As with the EU, however, these unsigned intentions insinuate themselves into real policy and soon become de facto law, and then real law.

·         May 2005.  CFR issues, “Building a North American Community,” in which is stated as their central recommendation, “the establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter.”[8]  Robert Pastor “was vice chair of the task force and principle editor of the CFR’s final report.”[9]



  • "We do not want another committee, we have too many already. What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all the people and to lift us up out of the economic morass into which we are sinking. Send us such a man, and whether he be God or devil, we will receive him."
    • Paul-Henri Spaak, former prime minister of Belgium, one of the founders of the EU, first president of the United Nations General Assembly, 1957.

  • “…And if we learn from our experience of turning unity of purpose into unity of action, we can together seize this moment of change in our world to create a truly global society.”
    • England Prime Minister Gordon Brown, referring to the financial crisis of 2008.

 

  • "We shall have World Government, whether or not you like it… whether.. by conquest or consent." 
    • James P. Warburg, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, international financier, 1950, speaking to the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

 

  • "the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down... but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault." 
    • Richard Gardner, CFR and Trilateral Commission member, former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, 1974 article in the CFR's Foreign Affairs.

 

  • "Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis." 
    • George Ball, CFR member, former under-secretary of state, NY Times interview, 1988.

 

  • “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years…It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” 
    • David Rockefeller, CFR chairman, Trilateral Commission founder, Bilderberg Group member, Chase Manhattan bank chairman, June, 1991, Bilderberg meeting, Baden Baden, Germany (meeting was also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton, Trilateral Commission member).

 

  • "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nation will accept the New World Order." 
    • David Rockefeller, CFR chairman, Trilateral Commission cofounder, Bilderberg Group member, Chase Manhattan bank chairman, 1994, speaking at the UN.

 

  • "Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." 
    • David Rockefeller’s book Memoirs published in 2002 (page 405).

 

  • "The precondition for eventual and genuine globalization is progressive regionalization."
    • Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member, Trilateral Commission cofounder, Bilderberg Group member, former National Security Advisor under Trilateralist Jimmy Carter, at the State of the World Forum, 1995.

  • BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!                                                                                                                                                                                        Back to top

 

[1] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pp. 3-4.

[2] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 14.

[3] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pp. 15-16.

[4] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 16.

[5] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pp. 16-17.

[6] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 18.

[7] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pp. 77-78.

[8] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 22, quoting the CFR task report Forward.

[9] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 27.

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you. Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you. Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you. Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

Are you a homosexual?Turn from your sin and come to Jesus Christ now.He loves you.

 

 

   

 BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!

 
Global Warming Scam                                             Back to top

Consider the facts:

 

  1. The consensus was recently global cooling.[1] 
    1. Time Magazine in 1974 asked, “Another Ice Age?”  Time quoted a University of Toronto climatologist as saying, “I don’t believe that the world’s present population is sustainable if there are more than three years like 1972 in a row [because of global cooling!].”[2]  These days, Time has cover headlines of, “Global Warming:  Be Worried, Be Very Worried.”  So, one day according to Time the sky is falling because of global cooling; the next because of global warming.  Apparently gloom and doom sells.  But Time is not alone.
    2. Newsweek in 1975 stated that global cooling evidence has “begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it.” 
    3. The LA Times in 1978 stated, “No end in site to 30-year cooling trend in Northern Hemisphere!”
    4. In the mid 1890s, the NY Times spoke of a frozen earth.  About 65 years later, in 1959 they said, “A warmer earth evident at poles;” two years later they said, “Scientists agree world is colder.” 
  2. Mars’ icecaps have been melting.  Neptune has warmed in parallel with Earth.  Are the Martians and Neptunians driving too many SUVs?  This clearly points to solar warming, not man-made warming. 
  3. Research at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Germany determined that the sun has been burning more luminously over the last 60 years.  They figured this alone would explain the slight increase in earth’s temperature in this period.
  4. In the past we’ve had ice ages.  It obviously warmed significantly after these ice ages.  What caused the subsequent warming centuries ago?  Cavemen in SUVs?  No, again natural variations in solar radiation.
  5. Global warming proponents say there is a scientific consensus and that the debate is over.  What consensus?  17,000 scientists signed a petition by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine saying, "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."  If there is a consensus, it’s that warming is NOT man-made.
  6. More recently, as reported by Newsmax, “over 100 prominent scientists from more than a dozen countries — including a Nobel Prize winner — have signed a letter to President Barack Obama charging that his views on climate change are ‘simply incorrect.’  The letter — sponsored by the Cato Institute — cites a statement Obama made in November: ‘Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change. The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear.’  Under the headline, ‘With all due respect, Mr. President, that is not true,’ the scientists state:  ‘We, the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated. Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now…The computer models forecasting rapid temperature change abjectly fail to explain recent climate behavior. Mr. President, your characterization of the scientific facts regarding climate change and the degree of certainty informing the scientific debate is simply incorrect.’ …A number of the scientists are current or former reviewers with the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with climate change crusader Al Gore — and have since reversed their views on man-made global warming.”[3]
  7. S. Fred Singer, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, stated in June, 2007, “…the widely touted ‘consensus’ of 2,500 scientists on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an illusion:  Most of the panelists have no scientific qualifications, and many of the others object to some part of the IPCC’s report.  The Associated Press reported recently that only 52 climate scientists contributed to the report’s ‘Summary for Policymakers.’  Likewise, only about a dozen members of the governing board voted on the ‘consensus statement’ on climate change by the American Meteorological Society (AMS).  Rank and file AMS scientists never had a say, which is why so many of them are now openly rebelling.  Estimates of skepticism within the AMS regarding man-made global warming are well over 50%.”[4]
    1. Singer also pointed out that in any event, scientific consensus is not how science works.  There were once consensuses that the earth was flat, that hands didn’t have to be washed before surgery and that time was absolute.  Science works by evidence, not a by show of hands. 
    2. Singer also indicates that data from the Climate Change Science Program Report 1.1, published by the U.S. government in April 2006, indicates that predicted levels of warming rates at various altitudes above the equator do not agree with observed levels.  Warming rates should be increasing with altitude; in fact, they are decreasing.  One can conclude by this that “man-made greenhouse contribution to current temperature change is insignificant.”  Singer further noted, “It is remarkable and puzzling that few have noticed this disparity between observed and predicted patterns of warming and drawn the obvious scientific conclusion” that manmade contributions to warming are negligible.
    3. The computer models may be off because they fail to account for natural feedback mechanisms which mitigate the effect of increasing CO2 concentrations and keep temperature change minimal.  One such feedback loop is that increased heat causes increased evaporation of the oceans, which causes increased cloud formation, which causes increased reflection of solar energy back into outer space, which cools the earth. 

                                                              i.      This is a really clever feedback loop design.

1.      Ps 19:1, The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork.  (NKJ)

    1. We don’t have recorded temperature data beyond a hundred years ago or so, but we do have proxies, or substitute indicators, for past temperatures.  One such proxy is oxygen-18, which forms with higher global temperatures; another is carbon-14, which forms with increased cosmic rays/increased solar activity.  An article in Nature[5] described a strong correlation between oxygen-18 and carbon-14 in a stalagmite from a cave in Oman over the past 3,000 years; that is, a strong correlation between rising and falling temperature and rising and falling solar activity.  Another article appeared in Science the same week with the same information.[6]  These articles conclude with near 100% certainty that solar activity is driving climate change.
  1. The biggest greenhouse gas is water, not carbon dioxide (CO2).  CO2 exists in atmospheric concentrations only 1-2% that of water.  Of that small fraction, only 3% is man-made.  Thus less than 1/10th of 1% of total greenhouse gases is man-made (less than a thousandth).  Are we going to regulate water vapor next?
  2. Most warming in this century occurred before 1940.  After 1940 there was cooling up to about 1975.  Then warming after that.  These cycles were absolutely uncorrelated to man-made CO2 emissions, which rose steadily throughout.
  3. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama indicated that half of warming occurred before 1940, when greenhouse gases were insignificant.  If that warming wasn’t caused by greenhouse gases, why is it claimed that the warming in the period afterwards was?
  4. Of the ten hottest years on record (1906, 1921, 1931, 1934, 1938, 1939, 1953, 1990, 1998, 1999), six were before 1940, when man-made CO2 emissions were significantly less (80% of manmade CO2 emissions came after 1940).
  5. In August 2007, NASA discovered a temperature data error which led to 1934, not 1998 as previously thought, being the hottest in U.S. history since records began.
  6. Greenland has been colder since 1940; Antarctica ice has grown since the 1970s; China built 117 coal-fired power plants in 2006; China is now the biggest GHG emitter.[7]
  7. Kyoto excludes 129 developing nations, such as China, Brazil, India and South Korea, the 4th, 10th, 12th and 13th largest economies in 2006[8], according to the World Bank.  Every 10 days China starts up a new coal-burning electrical generating station big enough to power San Diego; 2,200 of these will be built by 2030[9].  No amount of reduction by the US could possibly outweigh these additions, which are exempt!  China surpassed the U.S. in 2006 as the world’s leading greenhouse gas emitter.[10]
  8. Patrick Michaels, PhD, University of Virginia State Climatologist, stated, “The Kyoto Treaty would cost a fortune, between 1 and 3 percent of GDP per year. But the amount of warming that it would save would be 0.07 degree Celsius in the next 50 years. That was the argument that killed Kyoto in front of the Bush administration, that it costs a fortune, and it does nothing.”[11]
  9. What would Kyoto achieve if fully implemented?  The vast mountains of money and effort and misery would buy 6 years:  Says Bjorn Lomborg, “…the temperature we would have reached in 2094, we have now postponed until 2100.”[12]
  10. U.S department of Energy figures on Kyoto’s cost.[13]
    1. Gasoline increases of 14-66 cents/gallon.
    2. Electricity increases up to 86%.
    3. Coal prices increased a minimum of 153%.
    4. Annual cost as much as $338 billion in 1992 dollars.
    5. That’s about $1,000 for every man, woman and child.  If you have a wife and three kids, your annual family expenses would be an extra $5,000 or so per year.  Every year.  And for what?  Basically nothing.
  1. Canada dropped out of Kyoto in 2006, after being advised by 60 prominent scientists that manmade global warming was not backed by real science.[14]
  2. Only two European countries are on track to achieve their Kyoto targets to reduce 1990 greenhouse gas emissions by 8% before 2010, Sweden and the UK.  The others, which had greater-than-expected economic expansion, will have to pay stiff penalties of as much as $33 billion.  Payment is in the form of purchasing pollution credits.  Penalized for their economic growth.  But who will pay?  Businesses and taxpayers.  The businesses pass on the expenses to the consumer.  So who ultimately pays?  We do.  [15]
  3. In 1997, the U.S. Senate had a vote on whether to consider Kyoto.  The result of the vote?  95-0.  All against.  Not a single democrat or republican voted to even consider it.
  4. Antarctic ice cores show warming precedes increases in CO2 concentration, not vice versa.  Let me repeat that.  This is very important.  Listen.  Antarctic ice cores show warming precedes increases in CO2 concentration, not vice versa.  That fact alone is fatal to the idea of man-made global warming.  What happens is the earth warms first, then the oceans warm; then, like a warm soda losing its fizz, the oceans release dissolved CO2 gas.  The warming comes before the increase in CO2; the increase in CO2 does not come first as a cause for the warming.  Again, the warming comes before the increase in CO2.  It is also interesting that saltier water can hold less dissolved CO2; if the oceans weren’t salty enough, the plants probably wouldn’t have enough CO2 to survive.  Another design signature from the Creator.
  5. As noted earlier, CO2 is a negligible component of total greenhouse gases.  The father of climatology, Dr. Reid A. Bryson, stated:  “In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, …outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay?  …And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide?  Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.”  
    1. Dr. Bryson also stated that the earth has been “coming out of a Little Ice Age for 300 years.”  He said there have been many global warming periods in the past, which absolutely were not caused by man. 
    2. The Norse farmed in Greenland from the 10th century to the 13th. Today, these old Viking farmsteads are covered by glaciers.  What did they find when the ice sheets retreated in the Alps?  A silver mine, with the tools left there.  The miners expected to return the following season, but snows and ice came and stayed.  Thus, the earth has seen warm periods, followed by cold periods, following apparently now by another warming period.  These are natural cycles and all independent of man.
  6. Greenland began melting before 1940, and is actually colder now than in 1920-1940.
  7. After hurricane Katrina, proponents of man-made global warming were in hysterics.  Media hype over immanent catastrophes saturated the airwaves.  But how many major hurricanes touched land in the following year?  Zero.  R.A. Pielke Jr., in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, wrote, “no connection has been established between greenhouse gas emissions and the observed behavior of hurricanes.”  Since 1970, there has actually been a steady decrease in the number of hurricanes.
  8. A certain number of people die from cold each year.  With the slight warming apparently observed from increased solar activity (about 1 °F), the reduction in the number of those who die from cold far exceeds the increase in deaths caused by warming.  Global warming and increased CO2 levels also increase crop and forest growth rates and generally improve the health of both flora and fauna.  Thus the moderate global warming we are currently observing is actually causing plants to thrive and producing a net saving of lives.
  9. Temperature data from ground-based stations are almost certainly biased high.  Recent investigations[16] show that many of the temperature collecting stations have been compromised and are no longer built to standards (being built near “heat islands,” by hot AC vents, blacktop and cement lots, barbeques, buildings radiating heat, barrels for burning trash, etc.).  This means that the estimates of the magnitude of global warming are almost certainly biased high.  In addition, Temperatures measured using thermometers a century ago were biased low.[17] 
  10. NewsMax magazine observes: “almost half the claimed warming appeared during two years early in the 20th century before greenhouse pollution reached high levels.  This temperature jump coincided with a change in how the United States and Great Britain measured temperature on ships around the world and therefore might not be real but due to this change.  If measurements a century ago were too low and those today are too high, and if the biggest recorded jump in temperatures during the last centrury might not really have happened, is global warming happening at all?”[18]
  11. Here’s how crazy the hysteria is getting over global warming:  U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon actually blamed the U.S. for the genocide in Sudan, as follows.  He states that the genocide was prompted by drought, and the drought was caused by global warming; and, since everyone knows that the U.S. is to blame for global warming, the U.S. is ultimately to blame for the genocide!
  12. Here’s another insane idea.  They are actually talking about sequestering CO2 from emission sources and pumping it into underground caves where it will then be sealed!  This would be hugely expensive and do absolutely no good!  Truly insane.
  13. More craziness:  “Ellen Goodman from the Boston Globe wrote, ‘Let’s just say that global warming deniers are now on par with Holocaust deniers.’”[19]  If a Holocaust analogy is to be used, it would be that proponents of manmade global warming are promoting a lie just as the Nazis promoted one regarding Jewish inferiority.
  14. Still more:  The California wildfires of 2007 were blamed on global warming![20]
  15. Proponents of global warming also argue that “deniers” of man-made global warming are being funded by vast amounts of money from oil companies.  The truth is that the funding for proponents of manmade global warming far exceeds that of rational scientists who question global warming and are doing the real science debunking the myth.
  16. The energy working group for the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) between the U.S., Mexico and Canada stated in their 2005 Report to Leaders “that their goal was ‘creating a sustainable energy economy for North America.’  To seasoned readers of international documents, the word ‘sustainable’ used in this context is a code word to globalist thinking embedded in UN doctrine intended to limit the growth of developed nations such as the United States.”[21]
  17. The Supreme Court of the US, in response to a lawsuit by the state of Massachusetts against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for its refusal to regulate CO2 as a pollutant, recently ruled that CO2 (the gas that we exhale and plants breathe) is a pollutant.  This sets the stage for an emissions cap and trade program, a carbon tax, rising fuel bills, increased poverty, the draining of the wealth of the US, and a slide toward global government.
  18. The director of state affairs at the Institute for Energy Research, Dan Simmons, says the cap-and-trade program will be “the largest tax increase of all time of all American history and probably all world history."[22]
  19. California Assembly Bill 32 requires a statewide cap on greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of these emissions from major stationary sources, and development of a mandatory reporting system for these emissions.  Dr. Margo Thorning, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist for the American Council for Capital Formation, authored a report on the bill and cautioned that its passage would cause economic damage to California while doing absolutely no good:  "AB 32 is likely to cause ‘leakage’ of industry to states and countries with no mandatory emission caps resulting in job losses and no net reduction in GHGs. Given the quality and quantity of empirical research demonstrating that near-term targets and timetables for CO2 emissions reductions will negatively impact California without materially slowing the growth of global emissions, policymakers in California should consider carefully whether they want to proceed down this path alone."  The California Chamber of Commerce released the report in Sacramento on June 15, 2006.  Governor Swarzenegger ignored its wise advice and signed the bill into law anyway on September 27, 2006.  The bill will result in increased energy costs, industry fleeing to other states/countries, gross state product erosion and widespread job loss.  Swarzenegger ran for governor on a pro-business platform, embracing them as friends.  Now he’s stabbing them in the back.  The old saying is true, one can plunge the knife in deeper after first embracing.
  20. The City of Boulder implemented the Climate Action Plan Tax on November 8, 2006, implementing the first government carbon tax for global warming.  Unless we expose this lie, this will be coming to all of our cities.
  21. Al Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth, is filled with errors and deceptions.  So much so that a British judge ruled that children watching Inconvenient Truth must be made aware of 9 inaccuracies in the movie .[23]  The errors/unsubstantiated claims[24]: 
    1. Sea level would rise by 20 feet.
    2. Pacific islands being flooded/evacuated.
    3. Ocean Conveyor, which drives the Gulf Stream, being shut down.
    4. Graph showing increased CO2 levels lead to increased temperatures (as noted earlier, it is known that just the opposite is true, that increased temperature come first, then increased CO2 levels).
    5. Snow loss on Mt Kilimanjaro caused by manmade global warming.
    6. Drying of Lake Chad caused by manmade global warming.
    7. Hurricane Katrina caused by manmade global warming.
    8. Polar bears disappearing by manmade global warming.
    9. Coral reefs dying by manmade global warming.
  22. Many additional errors have also been exposed in Gore’s movie “fiction,” among them:[25]
    1. 100 ppmv of CO2 "melting mile-thick ice."
    2. Hurricane Caterina "manmade."
    3. Japanese typhoons "a new record."
    4. Hurricanes "getting stronger."
    5. Big storm insurances losses "increasing."
    6. Mumbai "flooding."
    7. Severe tornadoes "more frequent."
    8. Arctic "warming fastest."
    9. Greenland ice sheet "unstable."
    10. Himalayan glacial melt waters "failing."
    11. Peruvian glaciers "disappearing."
    12. Mountain glaciers worldwide "disappearing."
    13. Sahara desert "drying."
    14. West Antarctic ice sheet "unstable."
    15. Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves "breaking up."
    16. Larsen B Ice Shelf "broke up because of  'global warming.'"
    17. Mosquitoes "climbing to higher altitudes."
    18. Many tropical diseases "spread through 'global warming.'"
    19. West Nile virus in the US "spread through 'global warming.'"
    20. The European heat wave of 2003 "killed 35,000."
    21. Pied flycatchers "cannot feed their young."
    22. The Thames Barrier "closing more frequently."
    23. "No fact...in dispute by anybody."
  23. Still more Gore Inconvenient Truth untruths
    1. Aral Sea has been drying because of global warming.  In fact the cause has been the Soviet diversion of rivers which once fed into it.[26]
    2. Snow loss on Mount Kilimanjaro caused by global warming.  In fact, the cause has been deforestation, which reduces humidity and precipitation; satellite data actually shows the mountain to be colder than in 1970.[27]
  24. Is there deliberate bias?  Dr. Stephen Schneider, co-director of Stanford’s Center for Environmental Sciences and Policy, co-founder of the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Climate Project, editor in chief of the journal Climatic Change and a fervent proponent of manmade global warming, stated, “…we need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination.  That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage.  So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have…”[28]  Leonardo DiCaprio said of his The 11th Hour, “I want the public to be very scared by what they see. I want them to see a very bleak future…We need to get kids young."[29]
  25. Sometimes the word “anthropomorphic” is used in connection with global warming.  It’s just a fancy word meaning caused by man.
  26. Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Change is expected to spend “$100 million a year advertising global warming alarmism.”[30]  Where did he get that kind of money?  Wealthy globalists wanting to fuel hysteria and effect a global tax maybe?  Gore is also in bed with investment bankers who are poised to become very rich by the new carbon industry.
  27. Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were jointly awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.  About this, Hal Lindsey stated[31]:  “In recent years, the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded or shared by such illustrious luminaries for peace as Yasser Arafat, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, Mikhail Gorbachev, Kofi Annan and Jimmy Carter.  In case you aren’t keeping track …that’s one unrepentant terrorist, two Marxist socialists, one soviet communist leader, one international thief of historic proportions and of course one useful idiot, in that order.”  They are certainly upholding tradition by awarding the Peace Prize to Gore and the IPCC, who advocate policies which would lead to decreased development, increased world poverty, increased tensions, and therefore increased chance for war.  Truly amazing!
  28. The Nobel was also awarded to Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy under President Obama.  Despite the overwhelming evidence against man-made global warming, Chu stated, “The science is clear and compelling; greenhouse-gas emissions, primarily from fossil fuels, are changing our climate.”[32] 
    1. It is clear the Nobel is now being used to advance political agendas.  That way, when the purchased stooge says, “the earth is flat!” people will think, “he won a Nobel…maybe the earth really is flat!” 
  29. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, demonstrating a Marxist/communist approach to exploiting crisis to foment change, said on March 6, 2009 at the European Parliament, ”Never waste a good crisis ... Don't waste it when it can have a very positive impact on climate change and energy security."  She would like to see the manufactured global warming and economic crises used to create a climate of fear whereby Americans would accept a carbon tax.
  30. This is all leading to a system of carbon emissions trading, whereby those who put CO2 into the atmosphere will have to pay to a global entity.  This will drain the wealth and power of the US, producer of about 20% of man-made CO2 emissions, and further weaken its ability to resist global governance.  It is basically a wealth transfer scheme on an enormous scale. 
  31. Former French President Jacques Chirac said at the Hague in November 2000 that the Kyoto Protocol represents “the first component of an authentic global governance.”  Why?  Because it will lead to the global governing of world energy use, hence to the global governing of the world economy.  For those unwilling to have their economies controlled by this global entity, he proposes a global tax which he hopes will be collected in Europe.  He said in Paris on Jan 31, 2007, “A carbon tax is inevitable.  If it [the global carbon tax] is European, and I believe it will be European, then it will all the same have a certain influence because it means that all the countries that do not accept the minimum obligations will be obliged to pay.”  The tax would take the form of a tariff on exports to Europe from countries who haven’t signed Kyoto.  He also demanded that the United States sign both the Kyoto protocol and its successor agreement that will take effect when the Kyoto accord expires in 2012.  It is interesting that the Bible predicts the formation of a one-world government during the last days with a one-world economy centered in Europe; that would require one-world taxation, with taxes flowing to Europe.  The idea of manmade global warming is a convenient lie, a contrived crisis on the road to global government.

The contrived, non-existent crisis of man-made global warming is being used by globalists as a means to unite mankind behind a common cause to create a global tax and global governance.

 

 

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us [that is, all of humanity toward global government], we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” The Club of Rome, a globalist group, 1991 report.

 

 

"The task of saving the earth's environment must and will become the central organizing principle of the post-Cold War world."  Al Gore, former U.S. Vice President; Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Trilateral Commission (TC) member; 1992.[1]

 

“[the Kyoto Protocol represents] the first component of an authentic global governance.”  Jacques Chirac, former French President; Bilderberg participant; the Hague, November 2000.

 

 

“Never waste a good crisis ... Don't waste it when it can have a very positive impact on climate change and energy security."  Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State under Obama; Bilderberg participant and CFR member; speaking of the financial crisis to European Parliament, March 6, 2009.

 

 

“It is the awareness itself that will drive the change.  And one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.”  Al Gore, former U.S. Vice President; CFR and TC member; Oxford, July 7, 2009.

BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!
                                                                                                                                      Back to top

[1] Glenn Beck, “Exposed:  Climate of Fear,” CNN, 5/2/07.

[2] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 15.

[3] “100-Plus Scientists: Obama ‘Simply Incorrect’ on Global Warming,” Newsmax, April 5, 2009,  http://www.newsmax.com/insider_report/Obama_Blesses_Kissinger/2009/04/05/199963.html.

[4] S. Fred Singer, “Global Warming:  Man-Made or Natural?” at Hillsdale College, reported in August 2007 issue of Imprimis; http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2007&month=08.

[5]  Nature 411, 290-293, 17 May 2001.

[6] Science 292, 1367-1370, 18 May 2001.

[8] George Will, “Inconvenient Kyoto Truths,” Newsweek, 2/12/07.

[9] George Will, “Inconvenient Kyoto Truths,” Newsweek, 2/12/07.

[10] International Herald Tribune, 6/20/07, http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/20/business/emit.php.

[11] CNN’s Capital Gang interview; 8/19/02; http://www.cato.org/research/articles/michaels-020819.html.

[12] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 8.

[13] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pp. 6,11.

[14] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 7.

[15] Noel Sheppard, Countries Missing Kyoto Targets, Taxpayers to Foot the Bill, NewsBusters, 11/30/07.  http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/30/countries-missing-kyoto-targets-taxpayers-foot-bill.

[16] Hannity’s America, 7/15/07, interview of Anthony Watts (more information on www.surfacestations.org).

[17] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 12.

[18] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 12.

[19] Glenn Beck, “Exposed:  Climate of Fear,” CNN, 5/2/07.

[20] Jim Meyers; “Global Warming Being Blamed for Calif. Wildfires;” Newsmax.com; 10/22/07; http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/Fires_Global_Warming/2007/10/22/43539.html?s=al&promo_code=3BE7-1.

[21] Jerome R. Corsi, The Late Great USA, (Los Angeles, World Ahead Media, 2007), pg. 84.

[22] Pete Chagnon, “Cap-and-trade - 'Largest tax increase of all time',” OneNewsNow, 3/30/2009, http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=468158

[23]Newsmax staff, “John Stossel Exposes Global Warming Myths,” Newsmax, 10/17/07.  http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/global_warming/2007/10/17/41855.html?s=sp&promo_code=3BB3-1.

[24] Noel Sheppard, “Correction: Judge Finds Only Nine Convenient Untruths in Gore's Film;” NewsBusters, 10/11/07; http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/11/correction-judge-finds-only-nine-convenient-untruths-gores-film.

[25] Christopher Monckton, “35 Inconvenient Truths;” Science and Public Policy Institute, 10/18/07; http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html.

[26] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 3.

[27] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 3; substantiated by the International Journal of Climatology and the Journal of Geophysical Research.

[28] Lowell Ponte and Marc Morano, NewsMax Magazine, July 2006 reprint, pg. 4.

[30] Noel Sheppard, “Global Warming Ads From Al Gore Coming Soon,” NewsBusters, August 26, 2007; http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/08/26/global-warming-ads-al-gore-coming-soon.

[31] Hal Lindsey, Hal Lindsey Report, TBN, 10-19-07.

[32] Steven Chu, “Pulling the Plug on Oil,” Newsweek, April 13, 2009.


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!

The Lie of Evolution[1]                                  Back to top

 

 Hardware and software

 

Like a computer, living systems are made up of hardware and software.   The hardware is mostly protein, which is built from about 20 different types of amino acids.  The software is DNA.  The DNA is a chain of four different types of molecules called nucleotides, abbreviated A, T, G and C.  There are about 6 billion nucleotides in human DNA.  Just like the order of letters produces words and sentences, the order of these nucleotides contains the information for all living systems.  The order of every three nucleotides codes for a certain amino acid.  The amino acids are assembled into protein molecules, and these proteins are used to assemble all living systems. 

 

For DNA to have evolved independent of the apparatus to read it would be like a computer program evolving independent of the computer which uses it.  This would be like a computer being assembled by random interactions of atoms in one place, and at the same time a computer program like Excel being independently assembled on a disk by random interactions of atoms in another place, and the two working together just fine!  However, the program would also need to have happened to carry information on how to make itself and make the computer!  And vastly more than that, for a computer and a computer program is vastly simpler than a human being.  This is clearly an absurd proposition.

 

Also, proteins are needed to make DNA, yet DNA is needed to make the proteins that make the DNA.  Which came first, the DNA, which makes the proteins needed to make itself, or the proteins which make the DNA?  The answer is that both had to have been created simultaneously.

 

 

Problems with oxygen; problems without oxygen

 

Proponents of evolution theorize that the prehistoric oceans of earth were composed of an organic soup containing the building blocks of matter.  However, since oxygen destroys these building blocks, the early atmosphere could not contain oxygen.  However, without oxygen there is no ozone; without ozone, there is no filtering of UV light; without filtering of UV light, the UV light would destroy the building blocks.  Thus, with oxygen the building blocks are destroyed; but without oxygen they are also destroyed.

 

 

Spark and soup experiments

 

Spark and soup experiments attempted to test the theory that the molecular building blocks of life could be created in an early earth atmosphere.  A glass container with water, methane, hydrogen, carbon monoxide and ammonia was exposed to a spark source.  85% of what was made was tar, 13% carboxylic acids (mostly not used in living systems), and 2% was a few of the 20 amino acids found in living systems.  This was heralded as "proof" of evolution.”  However, what was not said was,

 

  • The solutions produced by these experiments were highly toxic and would kill any living system.
  • Any biomolecules that might have formed would bond with the tar or the carboxylic acid far more readily than with each other, rendering them unavailable.
  • Proteins (combined amino acids) were not produced.
  • Nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA) were not produced.
  • There is no geochemical evidence that a primordial soup ever existed on planet earth.
  • There's no evidence that the early atmosphere had no oxygen.  In fact, oxygen is produced by photodissociation, which is UV light striking a water molecule in the upper atmosphere to produce oxygen and hydrogen.  There was water and sunlight; therefore there was oxygen.
  • Even if there were no oxygen, the UV radiation from no ozone would destroy any biomolecules that might have formed.
  • If the early atmosphere did have ammonia and methane without oxygen, they would have been destroyed within a few thousand years by the intense UV radiation.  Hydrogen would have dissipated into outer space after a few thousand years.
  • There are molecules in our body that are so complex that not only do spark and soup experiments fail to produce them, but even the brightest chemists in the world today still cannot synthesize them.

  

Chirality

 

Amino acids which make up proteins come in two forms, left-handed and right-handed.  These have exactly the same atoms and structure, but are three-dimensional mirror images of each other, just like your left and right hand.  In nature, or in spark and soup experiments, left and right handed amino acids are formed in equal quantities, and any proteins that did happen to form from them would consist of equal portions of left and right handed amino acids.  However, all proteins in living systems are made up of only left-handed amino acids.  This is virtually impossible to explain through chance chemistry.  It would be like having a bag of equal amounts of left- and right-handed gloves, which were to be assembled together to produce a string of gloves, and constantly picking only the left handed ones; if a single right-handed one is picked and used in the assembly, the structure would be destroyed because its three-dimensional shape, which is critical to its function, would be altered. 

 

The same issue exists for DNA; which consists exclusively of right-handed nucleotides; a single left handed nucleotide in the structure would destroy its helical shape and ability to function properly.  Nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA, have never been formed in spark and soup experiments, but if they could be spontaneously formed through random chemistry, they would be formed in equal amounts of left- and right-handed molecules.  Can you imagine a DNA chain of 6 billion right-handed nucleotides forming from an equal mix of right and left handed nucleotides?  It is virtually impossible to have happened by chance and could only have happened with the biochemical expertise of a Creator.  This is an absolutely fatal problem for evolutionists.

 

   

Law of Mass Action and equilibrium—time won’t help

 

 

Amino acids combine to form proteins.  When two amino acids combine, they form a dipeptide protein molecule plus a water molecule.  The reaction can also go in the reverse direction.

 

Amino acid + amino acid  dipeptide + H2O

 

There is a principle in chemistry, called the Law of Mass Action, whereby a chemical reaction will go in a direction from high concentration to low concentration.

 

The oceans obviously have a very high concentration of water.  Thus, the above reaction would be driven not toward the combining of amino acids, which produces more water, but toward the destruction of any proteins that might have formed, which would reduce the concentration of water.

 

Thus, if you put protein or DNA in water, the water will react with them and break them up into their respective building blocks.

 

There is a condition called equilibrium in which the rate of reaction going forward (reactant molecules combining) is the same as the rate reversing it (product molecules uncombining).  Concentrations of reactants and products are at steady state in equilibrium.  Amino acids in water will combine to produce 1% dipeptides, 0.01% tripeptides, and less than one in 1020 (0.000000000000000001%) will exist in a chain of 10 amino acids.  This is a tremendous problem for evolutionists, because the smallest proteins in living systems are about 70 amino acids long.

 

Additions of long periods of time do not help.  In fact time becomes the enemy, because the longer the time, the more the state is driven to equilibrium in which are negligible quantities of proteins, especially of the length needed for living systems.

 

 

Information theory and language systems

 

All languages have meanings assigned to their means of conveyance, whether they be words, letters or codes.  The meanings must first be developed and understood before they can be conveyed or interpreted.  Without a preexisting language convention understood by the writer and the reader, the words, letters or codes would be meaningless.  Languages cannot develop randomly; all languages are developed by an intelligent mind.

 

There is no evidence that nucleotides, the building blocks of DNS, have ever come about by chance chemistry, but if they did, and if they randomly assembled into DNA, they would contain no information.  If the four nucleotides of DNA–abbreviated A, T, G and C–were randomly assembled, it would be like the shapes of the letters of the English alphabet being randomly assembled onto a page; neither would contain any meaning.  Meaning must first be assigned to the letters by some intelligence, the letters must be assembled into a meaningful order per the language convention, and the language must be understood by the reader in order to be interpreted.  This cannot come about by chance.  This can only come about by intelligent means.  In fact, the introduction of randomness into a language is destructive to it or even lethal.  A single incorrect character in a computer program can cause it to fail. 

 

The DNA code is highly sophisticated, and it is vastly more complicated than any computer program in existence today.  It is a digital, error-correcting (molecules travel along the length and “feel” for errors), redundant (critical code segments are backed up in other areas of the chain, in case that section of the chain becomes damaged), overlapping and tightly compressed, semantic (has grammar, punctuation, syntax), information storage and retrieval system.  The overlapping part is like removing the spaces from this sentence, putting them back in elsewhere, and still having an intelligible sentence.  The code is far, far more sophisticated than any computer program man has ever devised.  It is a product of a genius so vast that it is beyond comprehension.

 

Language units such as sounds or shapes or codes have no inherent meaning in and of themselves; an intelligent mind is required to assign meaning to them.  Dots and dashes have no inherent meaning, and a series of dots and dashes would be look like meaningless gibberish.  But if an intelligence assigns meaning to the order of dots and dashes, and conveys the rules to a second party, the second party could recognize the language as Morse code.  Similarly, nucleotides have no inherent meaning.  An intelligence had to assign meaning to the order of nucleotides, and convey those rules to the cellular machinery which reads this language and manufactures the complex biomolecules of life.  Again, languages must come about by intelligent minds and cannot come about by chance.  It is not possible.  Of course God created the DNA code and the cellular machinery capable of reading it.

 

Evolutionists often argue that given enough time DNA could randomly form.  There was a debate in 1860 in England between Archbishop Samuel Wilberforce and evolutionist Thomas Huxley. Wilberforce argued that where there was design there must be a Designer.  Huxley argued that if a monkey typed randomly on a typewriter for a long enough time, he would eventually produce the works of William Shakespeare.  Huxley was right; however his analogy did not accurately represent the reality of chemical reactions in the real world.  In the real world, the combining and uncombining of biological building blocks would both be occurring.  In an equilibrium condition–the steady state condition that would develop after a long period of time–the combining and uncombining occurs at equal rates and would never reach more a few or so being combined.  Thus, if we were to adjust the analogy to match the real world, the monkey would be typing and erasing letters at an equal rate, and would never get more than a few letters on the page regardless of whether he typed for a hundred or a billion or a billion billion billion years.  Moreover, to reflect reality, each letter of the typewriter would have a second mirror image of itself (left- and right-handed letters), and if the mirror image were ever used, it would be lethal to any developing biomolecular chain.   Thus, since each letter image and mirror image have equal chance of being typed, every other keystroke would be fatal.  Moreover, the keyboard would have to be populated by far greater numbers of meaningless “junk” key symbols, which represent the tar and other chemicals to which any biological building block would far more readily bond.  Any time one of these is pressed, the chain is destroyed for use in a living system. 

 

The conclusion:  not even one of the thousands of biomolecular polymers (protein, DNA) required by living systems could have come about by chance.

 

A single human cell contains the equivalent of ten thousand 300-page books of information, and all of this fits into a nucleus which has a diameter of about a hundredth of a millimeter.  The DNA in the human body’s 100 trillion cells if printed in these same books would fill a container the size of the Empire State Building 760 million times.  Again, the monkey would never get past a few letters, let alone a sentence or this vast amount of information.

 

The mechanism of change in evolution is the mutation.  However, mutations are extremely rare and almost always harmful.  Only about one in ten billion cell divisions results in a mutation, and only one in ten thousand mutations is potentially beneficial.  The rest are either fatal, harmful or at best neutral.  There would be thousands and thousands of harmful mutations for any beneficial one.  The inescapable mathematical result of this tremendous informational contamination would be that the population would die off long before any beneficial structure or new species could ever develop.  Geneticists have concluded that the population would accumulate so many harmful traits that it would become extinct long before it would accumulate beneficial change.  An analogy would be the random introduction of code into a computer program.  With 9,999 fatal or harmful changes for every potentially helpful one, the computer program would be fatally compromised long before any beneficial trait could ever be incorporated and copied for future use.

 

All of these facts are absolutely fatal to the theory of evolution.

 

 

Transitional forms

 

If evolution were happening, there would have to be so many transitional forms (species gradually transitioning from one form to another) that we’d be swimming in a sea if not a universe of their fossils.  Indeed, all the matter in the universe couldn’t contain their numbers. 

 

However none has ever been found.

 

 

Irreducible complexity

 

The theory of evolution teaches that new species form when there are genetic mutations which result in more favorable traits which increase the chance of survival and reproduction.  Organisms with beneficial mutations would be “naturally selected” and their genes concentrated in a population, and those without the beneficial trait would die off.  Eventually, after enough change, new species would form.

 

The problem with this theory is that structures in living systems are made of multiple subcomponents, all of which are needed for the system as a whole to function.  For example, the visual system consists of about 40 subsystems, such as the cornea, iris, lens, retina, millions of rods and cones, muscles which move the eye and adjust the lens, the optic nerve with its million nerve fibers, and the portion of the brain which processes the visual signals.  If any of the subsystems are missing, there is no vision.  However, none of the individual subcomponents confer upon the organism any survivability benefit and would therefore not have been selected for preservation through the process of natural selection.  For example, a sightless organism which happened to have a genetic mutation whereby it was born with a bit of lens tissue on its forehead would not be able to see and would have no increased chance of survival, so the trait would not passed on but would die out.  Evolution has no explanation for how a system such as the eye can evolve through the gradual addition of multiple subsystems when none of the individual subsystems confer upon it any increased survivability advantage.  Since each subsystem is meaningless outside the whole, each would be eliminated before they could combine with the others.

 

The eye is amazingly complex.  To give an example, it has been calculated that it would take 200 years of a 1985-era Cray supercomputer’s time to process the billions of simultaneous non-linear differential equations the retinas of two human eyes process every second! 

 

Another interesting phenomenon is the minute eyeball motions–tremors, drifts and saccades– caused by six muscles which allow us to see.  The tremors, for example, are tiny eyeball wobbles with a diameter a hundredth the width of a human hair occurring about 50 times a second.  These constantly change minutely what we see and allow slight variation to the light impinging on the retina; without this variation, anything without motion in our visual field would fade to gray.[2]

 

Darwin himself said, “'To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.”[3]  By the way, Darwin didn’t come up with the idea of evolution.  A Greek by the name of Anaximander came up with the idea in the 6th century B.C., beating Darwin by 24 centuries.  The devil has been using this lie for centuries.

 

Another example is the formation of a wing.  Evolutionists would suggest that the arm of a reptile had gradual mutations whereby its scales were transformed into feathers.  However, being burdened with feathers without the ability to fly in the transitional state would be a disadvantage to the reptile, so this trait would die out before any wing could ever develop.  Eye components without sight or half a wing are useless, so natural selection would eliminate them and never allow the whole to form.

 

Still further, major systems of the body are interconnected to other major systems of the body in very complicated ways.  For example, the visual system is connected to the digestive system (seeing food causes salivation) and the reflex system (seeing danger triggers movement or flight).  Evolution has no explanation for this either.

 

Since evolution cannot explain a gradual accumulation of non-beneficial subsystems leading toward a beneficial system whole, and there is an absence of transitional forms, evolutionists have come up with the idea of “punctuated equilibrium,” whereby entire new species come about in a single generation (called a “hopeful monster”), something like a bird being born to a reptile.  But, for the sake of argument, let’s grant that there were billions of simultaneous chance changes to the genetic code such that a fully-formed bird was born to a reptile.  For that bird then to reproduce, another bird of the opposite sex must have been miraculously born to another reptile, at the same time, near the same place, and the two must have then met, and mated with each other.  Talk about miracles!  This is fantasy, not science. 

 

But they are right in the sense that it had to come about miraculously all at once, which it did, by God.   


BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!


[1] This chapter is mostly drawn from Dr. Mark Eastman’s lectures, entitled:  “Mystery of life's origin;” “So you want evidence;” “From the Goo to You;” “Evolution, Creation, Theistic;” “Evidence for God;” “Cosmos;” from the book “The Creator beyond Time and Space,” by Mark Eastman and Chuck Missler; additional source citations may be found within these studies (including the works of Christian author and scientist A.E. Wilder-Smith, and Michael Denton’s, “Evolution:  A Theory in Crisis.”)

[2] Tom Wagner, “Darwin vs. the eye,” Creation ex nihilo 16(4):10–13, September 1994.

[3] Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London, 1971, p. 167.

 

 

 

 

 

   Back to top

   

BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS! 

Proof of God’s Existence                                         Back to top

 Proof of a Creator God

 

An E. coli bacterium is a single-celled organism comprised of about 20 billion non-water atoms.  It is like a micro machine with 20 billion parts all intricately assembled in a water medium.  Its complexity has been likened to that of an entire city.  By comparison, a car may only have 20 thousand parts, only one millionth as many, but ten billion billion times bigger.  E. coli is shaped like a hot dog but very small.  About 40 of them could stretch across the width of a human hair; that’s like 40 microscopic machines, each of which has a million times as many parts as a car, parked end-to-end across the width of a human hair.  

 

If an E. coli bacterium were disassembled into its component parts (atoms), the probability that it would spontaneously reassemble is estimated at one chance in 10100,000,000,000, where 10100,000,000,000 is a 1 followed by one hundred billion zeroes.[1]  To put this into a more familiar form, that of percentages, the percent chance of this happening would be: 

 

0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000…0000000000000000001%

 

One hundred billion zeroes here, and then finally a one at the end.

 

Or, to put it another way, the percent chance that this wouldn’t happen would be:

 

99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999… 9999999999999999%

 

One hundred billion nines here.

 

These numbers are so long it would take 3,171 years just to read one of them at one digit per second. 

 

Now, which is more reasonable?  Is it more reasonable that to conclude that something with essentially zero chance of occurring has occurred (the evolutionist’s argument) or is it more reasonable to conclude that something with essentially 0% chance of occurring has not occurred (this is the creationist’s argument, that life didn’t come about by chance but that it was created by God, as described in the Bible).  And which takes more faith to believe?

 

Would you bet a dollar that life could occur by chance with these odds?  Would you bet your house?  Would you bet your eternal soul?  I doubt even the most zealous evolutionist would bet a dollar or his car or his house on those odds (ask one and see).  But they are willing to bet something infinitely more valuable–their eternal souls–on these impossible odds.  Why?  Because they so strongly refuse to give up their sins.

 

John 3:19-20, [Jesus said] "And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.  For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed.  (NKJ)

 

But God loves them, and they can change, if only they believe in Jesus Christ and receive Him as Lord.

 

John 3:16-17, [Jesus said] "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.  For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.  (NKJ)

 

What is impossible?

 

Science generally defines anything with a chance less than one in 1050 as to be so remote that it can be considered impossible[2] or miraculous.   1050 is a hundred thousand billion billion billion billion billion.  However, even if we were to make this a thousand billion billion billion times larger, it only increases the number to one in 1080 (the estimated number of atoms in the universe), still vastly less than one chance in 10100,000,000,000, the chance of a single bacterium coming about by chance. 

 

By this standard the evolution of life is well beyond impossible.

 

What about increased time?

 

The universe is estimated to be about 14 billion years old.  That’s 7.4x1015 minutes.  Let’s add a lot more time and give evolution, which is in its death bed, a fighting chance.  Let’s say the universe is a billion billion times older, or 14 billion billion billion years old.  That would be 7.4x1033 minutes.

 

Let’s further say that the entire universe is nothing but crushed up E. coli bacteria.  In fact the universe is mostly hydrogen, so this should give evolution a tremendous infusion of hope, one would think.  There are an estimated 1080 atoms in the universe.  An E. coli bacterium has 2x1010 atoms.  If the entire universe were nothing but disassembled E. coli atoms, there would be the equivalent number of atoms to produce 5x1069 E. coli.

 

E. coli takes about 20 minutes to divide (replicate itself).  Let’s use that same amount of time for the potential spontaneous generation or random assembly of E. coli from component atoms.  There would then be 3.7x1032 20-minute periods in 14 billion billion billion years.  Multiplying this by the number of bacteria gives 1.9x10102 chance trials for random assembly[3]. 

 

The odds then of a bacteria coming together by chance from a universe composed of nothing but crushed up bacteria over 14 billion billion billion years would then be (2x10102 chance trials)/(10100,000,000,000 chance trials needed), or one chance in 5x1099,999,999,897, still vanishingly negligible despite our enormously generous stacking of the odds.  Moreover, it matters little whether more time is added or even more mass or if the replication speed is lessened; the science and the numbers are simply too vastly against the random assembly of complex structures for this to be a reasonably prospect.  These numbers absolutely kill evolution.  But few know it because these facts are not widely publicized, and the impossibility is still taught as fact. 

 

Evolutionists who know the real science know evolution is dead.  That is why they are desperately scrambling to come up with new theories, like directed panspermia, which proposes that aliens seeded planet earth with life.  But this only transfers the problem to the aliens.  Where did they come from?

 

Which position requires more faith?  To believe in something whose odds are essentially zero (evolution) or to believe in something whose odds are essentially 100% (creation)?

 

And again, this is just for one single-celled organism.  Imagine how much further remote it would be for the evolution of a human being, which consists of about 100 trillion individual cells, all highly specialized and exquisitely coordinated with each other.



Proof of Jesus Christ as Savior and the Only Way for Salvation

 

If God created us, He certainly has the ability to get a message to us.  How does He do it?

 

One way is by prophecy, which is telling the future in advance.  Only God can do this, and only the Bible authenticates itself as being from God by telling the future in advance.

 

Deut 18:22, "when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing does not happen or come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD has not spoken…”

 

What is prophecy all about?  Jesus Christ.

 

Rev 19:10, “For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy."

 

 

There are over 350 prophecies in the Old Testament about the first coming of Jesus Christ.  Examples:

 

·         He would be born in Bethlehem.

o       Micah 5:2; fulfilled in Matt. 2:1-7; John 7:42; Luke 2:47.

·         He would be preceded by a Messenger.

o       Isaiah 40:3; Malachi 3:1; fulfilled in Matthew 3:1-3; 11:10; John 1:23; Luke 1:17.

·         He would enter Jerusalem on a donkey.

o       Zechariah 9:9; fulfilled in Luke 35-37; Matthew 21:6-11.

·         He would be betrayed by a friend.

o       Psalms 41:9; 55:12-14; fulfilled in Matthew 10:4; 26:49-50; John 13:21.

·         He would be sold for 30 pieces of silver.

o       Zechariah 11:12; fulfilled in Matthew 26:15; 27:3.

·         The money for which He is sold is to be thrown “to the potter” in God’s house.

o       Zechariah 11:13; fulfilled in Matthew 27:5-7.

·         He would be silent before His accusers.

o       Isaiah 53:7; fulfilled in Matthew 27:12.

·         He would be executed by crucifixion with other transgressors.

o       Psalm 22:16; Zechariah 12:10; Isaiah 53:5,12; fulfilled in Luke 23:33; John 20:25; Matthew 27:38; Mark 15:27,28.

·         He would be born of a virgin;

·         He would be born before Judah lost the ability to exercise law and justice, including the imposition of the death penalty;

·         He would be called out of Egypt;

·         He would be called a Nazarene;

·         He would be a descendent of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Judah;

·         He would be in the line of King David;

·         People would gamble over His clothes;

·         He would present Himself as Messiah on exactly April 6, 32 AD;

o       This is the most astounding prophecy in the Bible.  See Chapter 11 for more details.

·         He would open the eyes of the blind and the ears of the deaf; and make the lame leap like a deer, and the tongue of the dumb to sing.

·         His hands and feet would be pierced;

·         And many more.  Some estimate 456 in total.

 

Many of these are one in a billion or much higher probabilities, and some have never happened before, but just for the sake of argument, let’s say that they have an average probability of happening to someone of one in 1,000.  This is very conservative.

 

To calculate the probability of multiple probabilities occurring at once, the individual probabilities are multiplied by one another.

 

The probability of something with a chance of 1/1000 happening 350 times to a single individual would be (1/1,000)350, or one out of 101,150. 

 

Thus the probability that Jesus Christ was not sent by God under these very conservative assumptions would be one in 101150.

 

This is an extremely conservative estimate.  The chances are really much lower than this.

 

What are these chances like?

 

First, they’re well beyond 1 out of 1050, so they are well beyond the previously defined guideline for what is deemed scientifically possible.

 

A model for this probability would be:

 

What if for every atom of the universe, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and for every one of these atoms formed, there were a trillion-trillion universes forming a trillion-trillion times a second for the last trillion-trillion years, and then if I marked a single atom out of all these atoms, the chance of your picking it would be 1/101150.  Pretty well impossible.

 

This proves that Jesus was sent by God.  It would be highly unreasonable to conclude otherwise.

 

Now that we know that Jesus was sent by God, we’d better listen to Him.  What did Jesus say?  He said:

 

"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”  John 14:6.

 

“… He who has seen Me has seen the Father…”  John 14:9.

 

"I and My Father are one."  John 10:30.

 

"I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live.  And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die."  John 11:25-27.

 

"I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved…”  John 10:9.

 

"Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life.”  John 6:47.

 

"I am the bread of life.”  John 6:48.

 

"I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.  "If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.”  John 15:5-6.

 

"I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."  Rev 1:8.

 

 

Remember when Jesus was talking with the Samaritan woman at the well?

 

“The woman said to Him, ‘I know that Messiah is coming’ (who is called Christ). ‘When He comes, He will tell us all things.’  Jesus said to her, ‘I who speak to you am He.’” John 4:25-26.

 

 

After Jesus had risen from the dead, He said:

 

("…These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me."  And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures.  Then He said to them, "Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.  And you are witnesses of these things.  Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high.  And He led them out as far as Bethany, and He lifted up His hands and blessed them.  Now it came to pass, while He blessed them, that He was parted from them and carried up into heaven.  And they worshiped Him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy,        and were continually in the temple praising and blessing God.  Amen.  Luke 24:44-53.

 

 

Jesus Christ was God come in the flesh, He was crucified so that our sins could be forgiven; if we turn from our sins and believe in Him and receive Him as Lord and Savior we will be saved and spend eternity with Him in heaven.  This is a fact that can be proven through prophecy and the science of probability.  Again, it is way more reasonable to believe this than to not believe it.  It requires more faith to not believe it than to believe it.

 

 

Isa 1:18, Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.  (KJV)

 

 

Conclusion

 

If it’s impossible for even a single cell to have come about by chance, then life did not come about by chance, as evolution states, and evolution is wrong.

 

If life did not come about by chance, then the only alternative is that it must have been created, as the Bible states, by a Creator God, and the Bible is right.

 

Gen 1:1, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (KJV)

 

Ps 150:6, Let every thing that hath breath praise the LORD. Praise ye the LORD.  (KJV)

 

If it is impossible for Jesus not to have been what He claimed to be, then He is Who He claimed to be, the only Way whereby man must be saved.

 

 

Acts 4:12, Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.  (KJV)



[1] Harold Morowitz, Energy Flow in Biology, New York, Academic Press, 1968, p 67.

[2] Emile Borél, Probability and Life, Presses Universitaire de France, 1962.

[3] A similar illustration, but confined to oceans on earth, was given by Robert Shapiro in his book, Origins—a Skeptics Guide to the Creation of Life on Earth, Summit Books, New York, 1986.

 BUY MEAT FOR CHRISTIANS!


Back to top

Web Hosting